This debate is now closed.
What would you like to see as the future of the web?
The man credited with the invention of the world wide web, Sir Tim Berners Lee, has received a lifetime achievement award at the Webby award ceremony in New York. He said that the future of the web will be a collaborative effort. What would you like your online future to be?
Hopes for the future of the world wide web include possible semantic developments, improved services for web mobile devices as well as more negative ideas such as a rise in online crime and concerns about the safety of data.
Open source programming, social networking, mobile micro-blogging like Twitter and varied content online has changed the landscape of the web. International projects and collaborative social efforts online have changed the way we can swap data and learn.
This debate is not about British politics or particular software applications or companies. Watch Sir Tim Berners Lee at the award ceremony here.
Are there applications that can be built on the web that you would like to see? Has the internet improved quality of life? What do you think the next steps for the future of the web could be?
Published:
Tuesday, 9 June, 2009, 10:09 GMT
11:09 UK
All comments as they come in
Added:
Thursday, 11 June, 2009, 11:59 GMT
12:59 UK
Reliable broadband speeds at affordable prices. A watertight ban on government monitoring, recording and general interference. The end to vile fat cat music, film, television and book industries charging exactly the same for a virtual copy of their product as for a hard copy. Global television and film, instead of forcing people to break the law or watch their favourite programmes or films months after everyone else. Simultaneous cinema/streaming film release. Geeks respected in their own right!
Rachel, Brighton
|
Added:
Thursday, 11 June, 2009, 11:55 GMT
12:55 UK
Short term problems with the underlying Internet are technical ones. The internet is increasingly being used for streaming data, which it was never intended to do. Ultimately, somebody has to pay for the technology, which may put free access at risk.
Spam, which is wasteful and often dangerous, is a completely avoidable problem with better protocols, however the is no mechanism to make such a switch. It seems email as we know it will die, and maybe something better will rise from the flames
Chris, Berks
|
Added:
Thursday, 11 June, 2009, 11:34 GMT
12:34 UK
I'd like to see true Net Neutrality, and keep the web free from government control.
It's the only place to be free and uncensored, let's keep it that way.
Simon Egan, Eeter
|
Added:
Thursday, 11 June, 2009, 11:18 GMT
12:18 UK
I think it should give equal opportunity to all people all over the world to work and not have to be banned because their IP address does not qualify (as if there's the new IP discrimination thing). Jobs that are considered low-paying somewhere are VERY WELL PAYING elsewhere. If the net, with all its grace fails to bridge and reconcile this gap, it ceases to be the giant we all label it to be.
Dawit, Addis Ababa
|
Added:
Thursday, 11 June, 2009, 11:03 GMT
12:03 UK
In the short term? The big change will be the UI, as the web becomes indistinguishable from the desktop and more and more things move into the cloud.
In the long term? P2P DNS, mesh networks, government control neutralized via everything becoming encrypted, and eventually a great place to make 5-minute backups of your current brain state so that if you die, yourself from about 5 minutes ago can be rebooted into a new body.
Kevin
|
Added:
Thursday, 11 June, 2009, 10:51 GMT
11:51 UK
Yes we would like to see the applications that can be built on web. Yes, ofcourse the internet is absolutely improved and improving the quality of life, only it is depend upon user how he want to utilize this resource.For me for next future of web would be closer to virtual reality sort of web browsing. If the internet access and cost is reduced at minimal level then obiviousely users will increase more and more and awareness will spred out on global level, that create necessity for all users
Rajesh Parsekar, Phuket
|
Added:
Thursday, 11 June, 2009, 10:47 GMT
11:47 UK
The web sems to have a very bright future. If one more feature is added to the web called 'truth screener' then it would become the most useful device. Now, any body can add anything on web, whether truthful or false, If a "truth Screener, is addede, it would become really useful for everyone.
Shazib Khan, Lahore, Pakistan
|
Added:
Thursday, 11 June, 2009, 10:11 GMT
11:11 UK
First of all i have found myself in writing,this public and live device fits my predispositions/if there were no internet i should not do it/;free and easy i place my stories online to reach every man on the globe.Besides i got an avocation,have free access to all informations regard to my necessary data to write/wikipedia to read Author's biographies,Gutenberg with free ebooks downloading,and similar/Through interaction of writing/reading lots of online stuff i improved my English/met people
Slavica Todorovic, Jagodina, Serbia and Montenegro
|
Added:
Thursday, 11 June, 2009, 09:58 GMT
10:58 UK
As much as I'm still fascinated by aeroplanes , the internet is so impressive just the same . The problem with the www lies with the abusers who use their skills for illegal ends. Just came to my mind a certain thought ; Why can't the web be divided into several stations . One for science , one for media , one for stock exchange, one for debates and opinions and messageboards, and so on. Let each one have his preference.
Mike Stami
|
Added:
Thursday, 11 June, 2009, 09:31 GMT
10:31 UK
3 possible futures. In one, the "Managed Web", the Internet is a "safe, controlled and monitored" resource, where oppinion, free-speech and freedom of religion are under constant scrutiny. The second, the "Last Empire" uncharted, unregulated, unmanaged war-zone where Virtual Kings battle for Market Share. The third "Awakening", where technological integration enables communication, understanding and common-interests to maintain focus and resist division, hate and stereotyping. Or maybe all 3?
[Mr-Happy]
|
Added:
Thursday, 11 June, 2009, 09:07 GMT
10:07 UK
Thanks a lot for Tim Berners Lee, for giving me an opportunity to comment here in BBC through world wide web.
Has the internet improved quality of life? Mostly YES and for some NO. It depends on the usage of user.Live sword its a powerful tool.You can use WWW for improving your life.
The webs feature will be as beautiful as heaven.Let enjoy it :)
RAMesh Kumar SS, Chennai, India
|
Added:
Thursday, 11 June, 2009, 08:58 GMT
09:58 UK
While you have to be connected directly to a network, you are under the control of that network. This means that centralised control is inevitable for any managed network. The Internet has already come under the control of large corporates where every web page, every email and every instant message is logged and monitored. That information is available to governments as they require.
The only solution to this is an adhoc store and forward network which doesn't depend on centralised control.
Colin Smith, Berlin
|
Added:
Thursday, 11 June, 2009, 08:48 GMT
09:48 UK
It should be totally free.
Jay, Canada
|
Added:
Thursday, 11 June, 2009, 08:41 GMT
09:41 UK
this switch board should not have private networks and ought to be more open.governments should not interfere with it.
david lulasa, tambua village,hamisi,kenya
|
Added:
Thursday, 11 June, 2009, 08:36 GMT
09:36 UK
What I hope the future will be: No more geo-location restrictions on content.
This isn't just aimed at some frustrating recent developments on the bbc web site, but on so many websites these days.
Its gettng to the stage where 50% of the links i click on end up being unavailable. We would never have accepted this with written web content, but somehow its ok for video content.
Otherwise we are essentially heading towards a bunch of national-webs. I thought we were past that...
tim, tokyo
|
|
This Have Your Say is
CLOSED
DEBATE STATUS
Total comments: 685
Published comments: 603
Rejected comments: 82
From Have Your Say
|