This debate is now closed.
What are the chances for Mid-East peace?
Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu has accepted the creation of a Palestinian state - but only if it is demilitarised. Can peace be achieved?
In a landmark speech, weeks after US President Barack Obama urged him to agree a two-state plan, Mr Netanyahu said the Palestinians must accept Israel as a Jewish state.
But Palestinians have rejected his strict conditions to the plan, saying he has "paralysed" the peace process.
Meanwhile, the White House has welcomed the move by Mr Netanyahu, describing it as "an important step forward".
Until now the Israeli leader, had refused to accept anything more than a vague notion of Palestinian autonomy.
Can a two-state plan be salvaged? What do you think needs to be done to achieve peace in the Middle East? Can the wounds and hostilities between the various parties be healed?
Read the full story
Published:
Monday, 15 June, 2009, 09:05 GMT
10:05 UK
All comments as they come in
Added:
Wednesday, 17 June, 2009, 15:28 GMT
16:28 UK
Let's fire 200 rockets into your garden and see how you feel about that.
Martin1983
The problem is....
Is it their garden or the Palestinians?
Absinthe m
|
Added:
Wednesday, 17 June, 2009, 15:19 GMT
16:19 UK
None while israel continues to want to Lord it over the palestinians and the rest of the world allows it to happen
glen, Uk
|
Added:
Wednesday, 17 June, 2009, 15:16 GMT
16:16 UK
"How much of a threat to Israel are the rockets, there's a better chance of being hit by lightning than being killed by one. It's not a threat to Israel & certainly not a threat to a mythical world peace which doesn't exist." - Farside Alien
Let's fire 200 rockets into your garden and see how you feel about that. They may not be sophisticated weaponry like Israel's, but they're hardly flimsy fireworks either. They can and will kill, and this threat shouldn't be taken lightly or complacently.
[Martin1983], London, United Kingdom
|
Added:
Wednesday, 17 June, 2009, 15:01 GMT
16:01 UK
The chances for mid-east peace are ZERO if the US and UK by proxie continuously maintain the destabilization of it.
joyce, uk
|
Added:
Wednesday, 17 June, 2009, 14:58 GMT
15:58 UK
Well, simply put, the Palestinians can't be trusted with a military or with weapons. Not while they fire rockets willy-nilly (remember, that's why Israel attacked Gaza in the first place)
Martin 1983
Well, simply put Israel didn't exactly look too carefully to see if it was bombing UN buildings so we can take it they didn't look to hard when they bombed the Pal's houses.
You can't get Peace at the end of a sword, that goes for both sides.
You get years of resistance and resentment.
Absinthe m
|
Added:
Wednesday, 17 June, 2009, 14:46 GMT
15:46 UK
"Can someone explain to me why Israel should hand over land it captured in wars waged against her?" Sean Richards
Israel actually reclaimed some of the land captured in 1948 by Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon and Syria, who by the way had no intention of creating a Palestine. The Palestinians still live as refugees in these occupied lands.
As much as the West wants a 2 state solution, the ME will not accept a non-Moslem state in its midst.
Pritani Speaker, Norfolk, East Anglia
|
Added:
Wednesday, 17 June, 2009, 14:27 GMT
15:27 UK
Because they lost in '48, they tried again in '67. And '73. And let's not forget the likes of Arafat and Hezbollah and Hamas Martin1983 UK Nor must we forget Begin, Irgun and the Stern Gang. There is little difference between them. Winning a war will never, on its own, win peace. Building settlements on stolen land will only bring trouble. The Allies did not populate the Axis countries in 1945 but the Japanese settled Manchuria in the 1930s when they defeated China.
[swerdna]
|
Added:
Wednesday, 17 June, 2009, 14:24 GMT
15:24 UK
"I think a demilitarised Palastinian state is fine as long as Israel does the same. That would be fair wouldn't it? Or would Israel not like the idea of being competely unarmed.... Perhaps the Palastinians feel the same way? Steve E, Wallingford"
Israel is being asked to give up tangible things ie land, defensible positions for an intangible ie recognition, their fear is that Palestine would be base for further attacks, after all Arab countries have trouble keeping treaties with each other
JC, London
|
Added:
Wednesday, 17 June, 2009, 14:12 GMT
15:12 UK
Seems the arabs are OK with two states after all....just as long as they are both Arab
JC, London
|
Added:
Wednesday, 17 June, 2009, 13:54 GMT
14:54 UK
Palestine is no threat to Israel and the whole world knows it. GMB Bristol Sorry? Was i wrong in thinking the Palestinians had launched rockets at Israel constantly for a year? As the Palestinians are threatning world peace, surely the world should intervene Nick Lange
How much of a threat to Israel are the rockets, there's a better chance of being hit by lightning than being killed by one. It's not a threat to Israel & certainly not a threat to a mythical world peace which doesn't exist.
Farside Alien, Dark Side Of The Moon
|
Added:
Wednesday, 17 June, 2009, 13:35 GMT
14:35 UK
The chances of peace in the middle east are exactly the same today as they were three days ago (before the speech) the key factors are the same unreasonable Palestinian demands, for a return to the 1949 armistice lines and the destruction of the state of Israel through the displacement of large portions of the Israeli population Matthew Shostak, Brighton, United Kingdom
u most be joking right? displacement of pallys u mean, and pally agreed to 1967 boarders no one mention 1949. how naive.
[mikalish], quincy, United States
|
Added:
Wednesday, 17 June, 2009, 13:27 GMT
14:27 UK
"Israeli settlements are still being built on freshly stolen land. There is no war being waged upon Israel." - [Dave__G]
Freshly stolen? I don't know about you, but I'd say something acquired in 1967, legally or not, would be long stale by now. The Arabs are still trying to finish what they started in 1948 - that is why the aggression has continued to this very day. Because they lost in '48, they tried again in '67. And '73. And let's not forget the likes of Arafat and Hezbollah and Hamas
[Martin1983], London, United Kingdom
|
Added:
Wednesday, 17 June, 2009, 13:24 GMT
14:24 UK
"If the palestinian state is to be demiliterised, then so must the Israeli one. Simples."
Well, simply put, the Palestinians can't be trusted with a military or with weapons. Not while they fire rockets willy-nilly (remember, that's why Israel attacked Gaza in the first place) and while they continue to teach children in schools to hate the Israelis
[Martin1983], London, United Kingdom
|
Added:
Wednesday, 17 June, 2009, 13:02 GMT
14:02 UK
To the people of Isreal:
Please know we are dsgusted by the actions of former President Carter in trying to have Hamas removed from the terrorist watch list.
R Leeds
No, sorry, you dont speak for many of us, we still want Israel investigated for it's 100:1 ratio of deaths during the last GAZA incursion.
Israels govt does at it pleases why shouldn't Hamas? They were both elected by their people.
Carter at least wants Peace on both sides, not a land grab and look what Fatah is worth now.
Absinthe m
|
Added:
Wednesday, 17 June, 2009, 12:11 GMT
13:11 UK
This is something like someone occupies your house, kicks you out of your own house, calls you a thief and yet when you try to get your house back, they call you a terrorist and argues that they have the right to self-defence ~ Salim, Amesterdam
Not really is it ? It actually equates to 5million non-muslims in the area the size of a garage in a mansion. If 250Million over 60yrs cannot evict this tiny, "immensley persecuted family" from their "legally recognised sqatters rights", I'd give up !
[bradlypitt]
|
|
This Have Your Say is
CLOSED
DEBATE STATUS
Total comments: 1340
Published comments: 756
Rejected comments: 151
From Have Your Say
|