Skip to main contentAccess keys helpA-Z index

BBC News Updated every minute of every day



Have Your Say

Send us your feedback

New visitors:  Create your membership
Returning members:  Sign in
This debate is now closed.

9 Jul 09-Salford Liberty v Security

Four years on from 7/7, does the panel believe that the government has achieved the right balance between liberty and security?

Published: Thursday, 9 July, 2009, 18:45 GMT 19:45 UK

All comments as they come in

Added: Thursday, 9 July, 2009, 22:59 GMT 23:59 UK

We have entered an age where an individual's human rights outweigh the needs of society as a whole. Even those who are in the midst of an act specifically designed to curtail another life or the quality of another life can scream for the protection of the law and for their human rights. Should we not rename human rights as human privileges? People could have these privileges if they adhered to their human responsibilities - not mugging, killing, raping, stealing - no responsibilities, no rights!

David Hudson, Plymouth, UK, England,

Recommended by 0 people

Alert a Moderator

Added: Thursday, 9 July, 2009, 22:44 GMT 23:44 UK

Another whopper! We need to balance our civil liberties against security considerations. Lets tell the politicians to balance their civil liberties. Oh I forgot they are above the law. They make fraudulent expense claims and do not get prosecuted. They get a prison sentence (Lord Ahmed) and don't have to serve it in full. Who is supervising the so called supervisors? The best way to control your kids are to invent boogey men to keep them under obedience. The new boogey man is the terrorist!

John, Greenock, UK, Scotland,

Recommended by 0 people

Alert a Moderator

Added: Thursday, 9 July, 2009, 22:43 GMT 23:43 UK

I find it extremely offensive, slighltly ignorant and unexceptably naive for an adult to argue that an identity card has any equality to having a number tatooed into your arm in a death camp. Please do not use The Holocaust as a media stunt- grow up! There are no elements of suppression, torture and mass murder. Please consider your words.

sarah goodall, Stockport, UK, England,

Recommended by 0 people

Alert a Moderator

Added: Thursday, 9 July, 2009, 22:43 GMT 23:43 UK

I was absolutely astounded to note that not one member of the Panel, or the audience for that matter, thought it appropriate to point out to the student member that comparing ID cards to Auschwitz was a wholly offensive, inappropriate and ignorant remark. There is no cause to put encroachment on civil liberties, however serious, on a par with genocide. She should have been reprimanded for her comments and sent to take her history GCSEs again.

Irene, London, UK, England,

Recommended by 0 people

Alert a Moderator

Added: Thursday, 9 July, 2009, 22:33 GMT 23:33 UK

Did Andy Burnham just say "freedom is not absolute"? Am I the only one who sees the HUGE problem with this?

Gareth, Belfast, UK, Northern Ireland,

Recommended by 0 people

Alert a Moderator

This Have Your Say is 
CLOSED

DEBATE STATUS

Total comments:
6
Published comments:
5
Rejected comments:
1
No further comments will be published as debate is now closed

MOST POPULAR NOW

From Have Your Say

PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

bbc sport Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific